Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5893 13
Original file (NR5893 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JSR
Docket No. NR5893-13
10 October 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a} 10 U.8.€. 1582

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 4 Jun 13 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 17 Sep 13
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 11b

(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”") entry dated 6 July 2012 (copy
at Tab A).

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10
October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps office having cognizance over the
subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented to the effect
that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
c. The page 11b on which the contested entry appears also
includes uncontested entries.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11b (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 6 July 2012. This is to be accomplished by
reconstructing the page 11b on which the entry appears, or
completely obliterating the entry so it cannot be read, rather
than merely lining through it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Pmattie fo (ata

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e) )
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

For_wW. DEAN PFETFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6512 13

    Original file (NR6512 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 10 December 2012 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bey, Chapman and Green, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11847 12

    Original file (11847 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 27 October 2012 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Genteman and Marquez, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4667 14

    Original file (NR4667 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NJP of 15 November 2012. b. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future. d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2570 14

    Original file (NR2570 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Koman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on & January 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosures (4) and (5), the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13

    Original file (NR8518-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10191 12

    Original file (10191 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"”) entry dated 13 September 2011 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman and Marquez and Ms. Zivnuska, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 March 2013, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8361 13

    Original file (NR8361 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 30 September 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (neither of which is in his Official Military Personnel File) and 10 October 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (copies at Tab A). The Board, consisting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03524-10

    Original file (03524-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 22 July 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1llb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 April 1998. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 12640 12

    Original file (12640 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Clemmons, Gorenflo and Midboe, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 January 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070) ") entry dated 5 August >010 and his undated rebuttal. d. That any material directed to be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00380-10

    Original file (00380-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11B (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 5 June 2009, a copy of which is in enclosure (1) at Tab A. Humphrey and Nappo and Mr. Genteman, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 1 April 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...